Project Gold is a proposed data center development spanning Clifton and Covington Townships.
Learn what's being planned, explore public records, and understand the potential impacts on
our water, forests, wildlife, and quality of life.
Water Demand
591Gallons Per Minute
Estimated peak water withdrawal affecting local wells
Proposed Building Space
2.5 MillionSq. Ft.
That's roughly 14 Walmart Supercenters.
Project Land Area
Nearly 1,000Acres
Spanning two townships, this project is
MASSIVE.
Electricity Demand
2.2 Gigawatts
Proposed maximum electricity demand for the
development.
What's at Stake for Our Environment?
Unspoiled night skies, cold-water trout habitats, and ancient
boreal peat wetlands.
Although Project Gold is proposed
for Clifton and Covington Townships, questions about its potential impacts extend beyond
municipal boundaries. Residents throughout North Pocono—including Moscow, Spring Brook,
Gouldsboro, and surrounding communities—have an interest in understanding the project's
potential effects on water resources, infrastructure, and quality of life.
Stay Informed and Take Part
Explore project
records, follow township notices, and learn how residents can participate in public proceedings.
The reality behind Project Gold: why 2.9 acres of wetland
fill is only the tip of an ecological and public health disaster.
"Draining the Sponge": Beyond the 2.9-Acre
Fill
While developers downplay filling
"just 2.9 acres" of wetlands requiring PA DEP permits, wetlands do not exist in
isolation. The North Pocono plateau acts as a gigantic natural sponge. Massive building
foundations (FFEs up to 1910'), blasting, and extensive subterranean compaction will
sever subsurface hydrology.
Combined with an on-site peak well
extraction rate of 591.4 GPM, the project threatens to dewater hundreds
of abutting wetland acres, lowering water tables in surrounding peat bogs, vernal pools,
and private drinking wells.
Threat:Catastrophic drying of peat bogs & surrounding
residential well failure.
Exceptional Value (EV) Stream Degradation
The parcel assemblage sits directly
in the headwaters of the Lehigh River basin and Roaring Brook tributaries—waters
designated as Exceptional Value (EV) by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania.
EV waters represent the highest water
quality standard in Pennsylvania and are protected under state law by strict
non-degradation mandates. Clear-cutting hundreds of acres eliminates natural
forest canopy buffers, increasing thermal runoff pollution that destroys native brook
trout populations and sensitive aquatic macroinvertebrates.
Legal
Burden:The developer must prove zero
degradation to EV waters under PA Chapter 93.
Penetrating Cooling Fan & Chiller Noise
Unlike warehouses that get quiet at
night, hyperscale data centers generate relentless mechanical acoustic emissions 24
hours a day, 365 days a year. Cooling 2.2 Gigawatts of computation requires massive
rooftop condenser banks and industrial chiller yards.
These industrial fans produce continuous
low-frequency noise (40–60 Hz hum). Low-frequency sound waves travel
long distances over water and open terrain, penetrating walls, windows, and standard
woodland tree buffers, causing sleep deprivation, anxiety, and documented long-term
health crises.
Community
Impact:Constant industrial drone replacing
rural peace and quiet.
Heavy Bedrock Blasting & Construction Dust
Transforming nearly 1,000 acres of
uneven, boulder-strewn woodland into flat pads for 2.5 million square feet of
single-story buildings requires years of earth-shattering bedrock blasting, heavy
grading, and massive soil disturbance.
This activity releases dense clouds of
fugitive silica dust, diesel emissions from heavy machinery, and severe sediment loads.
During rain events, storm runoff easily overwhelms retention basins, washing sediment
and silt into pristine headwaters and coating neighboring properties in dust.
Public Health
Threat:Airborne particulates triggering
respiratory harm; choked stream beds.
Could Data Center Cooling Introduce
Forever Chemicals Into Our Groundwater?
Cooling technology:
Some specialized two-phase systems use fluorinated fluids that may contain PFAS; some
conventional single-phase closed-loop designs use water/glycol mixtures without PFAS.
“Closed-loop” describes how fluid circulates, not its chemical contents.
Potential pathways:
If chemicals are present, equipment leaks, maintenance accidents, or improper disposal
could create a release pathway to soil or groundwater if containment or handling fails.
This is a general possibility, not evidence of a release at this site.
Why it matters locally:
Many North Pocono households rely on private wells, making clear chemical disclosure
and groundwater monitoring relevant to residents.
What We Still Need to Know
Which cooling fluids, additives, and refrigerants are proposed, and do any
contain PFAS?
What baseline and ongoing groundwater monitoring would be conducted?
What leak and spill containment, response, and notification procedures would
apply?
How would used fluids be maintained, collected, and disposed of?
Project Gold status:PFAS use has not been established. These are
disclosure questions, not a claim that the project uses PFAS or that contamination
exists.
Could Treated Sewage Threaten Exceptional
Value Waterways?
Proposed water source:
The August 18, 2026 Water Supply Evaluation proposes using treated municipal wastewater
from the Covington Township Sewer Authority as makeup water for Project Gold’s
closed-loop cooling systems. This describes a proposal, not evidence that the water is
currently being used.
Treatment does not necessarily
remove every substance. Depending on treatment processes and water quality, residual
pharmaceuticals, nutrients, PFAS, dissolved minerals, or other substances could remain.
The cited materials do not establish that any specific contaminant is present in this
proposed supply.
Nearby water resources:
The August 17, 2026 Environmental Impact Statement identifies Meadow Brook, Rucks Run,
Silver Creek, and tributaries as Exceptional Value (EV) waterways on or near the site.
It also describes stormwater infiltration basins intended to direct runoff into the
ground and support groundwater recharge.
The cited application materials
describe a proposed cooling-water source but do not clearly identify where spent
cooling-system water would go when systems are drained, flushed, cleaned, or serviced.
Closed-loop systems recirculate water and minimize routine discharge, but maintenance
or equipment replacement can require fluids to be removed or managed. Improperly
managed releases could create a pathway to soil or water resources.
Questions That Need Answers
What total volume of treated municipal wastewater is expected to be used each
year?
What contaminants are present in wastewater supplied by the Covington Township
Sewer Authority?
Will the supply be tested for PFAS, pharmaceuticals, nutrients, and other
substances before it enters the cooling systems?
What corrosion inhibitors, biocides, and other chemicals would be added to
cooling water?
How often would cooling systems need to be drained, flushed, cleaned, or have
circulating fluids replaced?
What is the maximum volume of cooling water that could require disposal during
maintenance?
Where would spent cooling water be discharged, or transported for treatment
and disposal?
Will the developer commit to prohibiting cooling-system wastewater discharge
into infiltration basins, wetlands, streams, or the ground?
What containment and groundwater-monitoring measures would protect neighboring
private wells and EV waterways?
Why Exceptional Value Matters
Pennsylvania designates certain streams as
Exceptional Value (EV) waters because of their outstanding water quality or other
qualifying characteristics.
These waterways receive special protection
under Pennsylvania’s water-quality regulations, including antidegradation
requirements intended to maintain and protect existing water quality.
Project Gold’s Environmental Impact Statement
identifies several EV waterways associated with the development site.
Given these protected resources, residents should
expect a clear explanation of how the proposed cooling-water system will prevent
contamination of groundwater and surface waters.
Important clarification: The application does not establish that
Project Gold intends to discharge treated sewage directly into the ground or nearby
waterways, or that it intends to send cooling-system wastewater to infiltration
basins. The concern is that the cited materials do not clearly explain how spent
cooling water would be managed or detail safeguards against unintended releases.
Project Gold
application references
Water Supply Evaluation — Langan Engineering, August 18, 2026, pp. 2 and 10:
proposed treated municipal wastewater for cooling-system makeup water.
Environmental Impact Statement — Langan Engineering, August 17, 2026, pp. 4–5:
EV waterways and proposed stormwater infiltration basins.
Environmental Impact Statement, pp. 7–8: groundwater conditions, water supply,
and anticipated wastewater management.
Power Demand: Contextualizing 2.2 Gigawatts
(2,200 MW)
The August 2026 Project Gold filing requests 2.2 GW of grid-supplied
power through PPL transmission infrastructure. This chart compares that demand against major
power plants and cities.
Source: Project Gold Conditional Use Narrative
(August 18, 2026). Utility benchmarks based on regional grid metrics.
Engineered Building & Campus Specifications
(Langan CS100–CS106)
Details extracted directly from Langan Engineering Conditional Use
Plans (August 18, 2026):
Building / Component
Township Location
Footprint & FFE Elevation
Proposed Height / Details
Building 1 & 2
Clifton Township
~777,000 sq ft combined
1-story (≤65 ft)
Building 3 & 4
Covington Township (NW Campus)
475,006 sq ft each
1-story (≤65 ft)
Building 5
Covington Township (NW Campus)
388,500 sq ft (FFE: 1908.00')
1-story (≤65 ft)
Building 6
Covington Township (NW Campus)
388,500 sq ft (FFE: 1910.00')
1-story (≤65 ft)
Project Gold Total
Covington & Clifton (998.8 Acres)
~2.5 Million Sq. Ft.
2.2 GW Grid Load
Myth vs. Fact: Deconstructing
Developer Claims
Exposing the gaps between the developer's application
narrative and technical site plan reality (ordered from newest/most urgent to foundational
facts).
Myth: Shrinking the plan to 6 single-story
buildings makes this a "low impact" project.
Fact: Spreading 2.5
million square feet of single-story buildings across 998.8 acres creates a massive
land-clearing footprint. Single-story sprawl requires clearing more forest, installing
expansive impervious parking/mechanical yards, and destroying natural terrain,
permanently altering local hydrology.
Myth: Eliminating on-site gas/nuclear power plants
protects our local grid.
Fact: Demanding 2.2
Gigawatts (2,200 MW) from the public grid requires two massive new PPL substations (Big
Bass & Tamarack) and 500 kV transmission extensions. This immense load strain risks
regional grid stability, while rate-payers bear the risk of long-term utility
infrastructure cost shifts.
Myth: Closed-loop cooling eliminates water resource
and roadway traffic impacts.
Fact: Millions of gallons
of water must be trucked in via heavy tankers to initially fill the closed-loop HVAC
systems, causing heavy wear on Clifton Beach and Dorantown roads. Furthermore, peak
instantaneous well pumping rates (up to 591.4 GPM) can still affect surrounding
residential water tables.
Myth: Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) are
harmless green infrastructure.
Fact: Industrial-scale
lithium-ion battery banks carry serious thermal runaway and toxic off-gassing fire
risks. A BESS incident places an extraordinary burden on local volunteer fire
departments that must handle hazardous chemical fire containment.
Questions Requiring
Further Disclosure
Closed-loop cooling does not by itself answer
chemical-contamination questions.
Established technology facts: Cooling
systems use different fluids. Some specialized systems may use PFAS-containing
fluorinated fluids, while some single-phase closed-loop systems use water/glycol
mixtures without PFAS. A closed loop recirculates fluid; it does not identify the
fluid’s ingredients or establish how leaks, maintenance, and disposal are managed.
Project Gold-specific unknowns: The
materials reviewed do not establish which cooling system or fluids would be selected,
whether any products would contain PFAS, or what groundwater monitoring and spill
controls are proposed. PFAS use at Project Gold has not been established. These are
questions for disclosure—not a finding that PFAS will be used or that contamination
exists.
Myth: This project will bring huge tax benefits
without public costs.
Fact: Developers
frequently negotiate tax abatements (PILOTs) that offset promised revenues. Furthermore,
massive road wear and utility grid expansions risk passing financial burdens to
municipal taxpayers and regional ratepayers.
Myth: Townships are illegally excluding data center
development.
Fact: Municipal zoning
allows reasonable pathways for commercial development. Attempting to force hyperscale
industrial complexes into low-density rural or residential zones bypasses legitimate
municipal planning and local protections.
Review the primary documents on the Resources page
to see the full
public record.
Timeline & Key Players
Track key milestones from initial 2025 filings to the August
2026 Conditional Use application.
Current Review Status
Project History & Evolution
Decision-Makers & Boards
Filter municipal leaders, legal representatives, and advisory boards
involved in township review processes.
The Path to Denial: The Archbald
Precedent
Proof that municipal conditional use applications can be
defeated in Lackawanna County—and the exact legal roadmap for Covington Township.
Local
Case Study
Archbald Council Voted 7–0
to Deny
Developers
want communities to believe conditional use approval is automatic rubber-stamping. In
October 2026, Archbald Borough proved otherwise, rejecting the 14-building Wildcat Ridge
project after residents held the line over 9 hearings. Covington Township Supervisors
have the legal authority to do the same.
7 - 0
Unanimous Rejection
The Law: Why "Conditional Use" is NOT a Guaranteed
Right
Under the Pennsylvania Municipalities
Planning Code (MPC) and Covington Ordinance No. 2025-03, a conditional use is not
an automatic 'by-right' commercial permit. The applicant carries the initial burden to prove
absolute, concrete compliance with every technical standard in the ordinance. Once residents
present competent evidence of adverse community impacts beyond those normal to the use, the
burden falls squarely on the developer.
1. Specific Criteria
The applicant must provide concrete engineering
evidence—not hypothetical assurances—for buffers, setbacks, sound thresholds, and water
management.
2. General Standards
Supervisors have the legal mandate to deny any
proposal that threatens public safety, depletes local aquifers, or degrades Exceptional
Value watersheds.
3. Substantial Evidence
Citizen testimony on baseline noise, private well
depths, road geometry, and wetland hydrology creates a legally defensible record for
denial.
4 Legal Fronts to Defeat Project Gold in
Covington
Pillar 1 · Enforce Chapter 93 Exceptional
Value (EV) Non-Degradation
Environmental
Barrier
Both Clifton and Covington sit on
headwaters designated as Exceptional Value (EV) by PA DEP. Pennsylvania
law strictly mandates zero degradation of EV waters. Project Gold plans to fill 2.9
acres of wetlands, clear-cut continuous forest canopy, and grade near headwater streams.
Hearing Strategy: Demand that Supervisors deny conditional use until PA
DEP reviews and grants individual Chapter 105 wetland and Chapter 102 NPDES permits.
Emphasize that thermal stormwater runoff and siltation violate EV cold-water
protections.
Pillar 2 · Challenge the "Closed-Loop"
Hydrology & Aquifer Drawdown
Water
Security
The application narrative claims
closed-loop air cooling, but technical plans specify an instantaneous peak well pumping
capacity of 591.4 GPM. Pumping at this scale risks dewatering
neighboring residential wells and puncturing subterranean layers that feed contiguous
peat bogs.
Hearing Strategy: Require an independent, 72-hour pump test with
baseline monitoring on abutting private residential drinking wells before any vote
occurs. If the developer cannot guarantee zero drawdown, the use fails municipal health
standards.
Data center acoustic studies
frequently hide behind average dBA ratings. However, industrial chillers and rooftop
exhaust fans generate low-frequency pure tones (C-weighted sound) that
standard woodland buffers and house insulation cannot block, traveling across lakes and
quiet valleys.
Hearing Strategy: Force the township to measure low-frequency (dBC)
thresholds at property lines under Ordinance Section 404.9. Assurances by
developer-hired engineers are not legally sufficient evidence.
Pillar 4 · Intervenor Status &
Cross-Examination
Legal
Standing
In Archbald, residents succeeded
because abutting homeowners registered as formal parties (intervenors), allowing them to
cross-examine developer engineers, present independent expert witnesses, and preserve an
unassailable record for the township solicitor.
Hearing Strategy: Abutting neighbors within 500–1,000 feet of the
parcel boundary should seek formal party status at the start of Covington's public
hearings to cross-examine Langan Engineering directly on the record.
Resident Action Checklist: What to Do Next
1
Track the Covington Hearing Notice
Attend every Covington Township Board of
Supervisors meeting and watch the township's notice page for a hearing date. No date
has been announced in the township records reviewed through October 2026.
2
Support the County Health & Cumulative
Impact Study
Back Commissioner Bill Gaughan's initiative to
evaluate regional grid, water, and emergency response limits before any single
township grants approval.
3
Demand Full State PA GRID Compliance
Hold developers to Governor Shapiro's May 2026
GRID standards, guaranteeing that zero ratepayer money is used for PPL 2.2 GW
transmission upgrades.
Site Plans & Maps
Engineered site layout drawings prepared by Langan
Engineering (dated August 18, 2026). Click images to view.
Chronological archive of local reporting from Kat Bolus
(WVIA/NPR), commentary from Chris Kelly (The Times-Tribune), county leadership initiatives, and
national investigations.
Statewide
Policy · October 22, 2026Farm & Dairy
Pennsylvania Farm Bureau Calls for Data
Center Moratorium
Farm & Dairy reports that the
Pennsylvania Farm Bureau is urging lawmakers to temporarily pause data center development
while the state studies community impacts, supports small communities facing proposals,
and strengthens farmland protections.
County
Precedent · October 21, 2026Kat Bolus | WVIA News
Archbald Borough Council Unanimously
Denies Hyperscale Data Center Zoning
WVIA reported that Archbald Borough
Council unanimously rejected a zoning request for Cornell Realty Management's 14-building
Wildcat Ridge Data Center Campus on 578 acres.
No Covington conditional-use hearing date
announced
The township's application notice says
the Quantm Group application is under completeness review and no hearing has been
scheduled. September 1 minutes said a hearing date could not be set until a hearing officer
was chosen. The October 6 agenda lists an extension item for the application, but does not
state a hearing date or the outcome of that item.
September
16, 2026 · County InitiativeKat Bolus | WVIA News
Lackawanna County Commissioners Hire Firm
to Study Data Center Impacts
Commissioners hired EmPower Analytics
Group for $165,000 to conduct a 90-day countywide study of cumulative air-quality and
public-health impacts from proposed data centers and power plants.
Judge Voids Clifton Twp. Data Center
Settlement as Residents Push for Stricter Rules
Kat Bolus reports on the Lackawanna
County Court decision invalidating Clifton Township's controversial settlement agreement
with developer 1778 Rich Pike LLC. The ruling sent officials back to the drawing board to
draft comprehensive zoning standards maintaining strict 35-foot height caps.
County Commissioner Pushes for Moratorium
& Cumulative Impact Analysis
Reporting on Commissioner Bill Gaughan's
call for Governor Shapiro to institute a multi-year statewide moratorium on hyperscale data
center development while cumulative impacts on regional air quality, water supplies, and
electrical grid infrastructure are rigorously assessed.
Chris Kelly examines how multi-gigawatt
developer projects exploit neighboring rural municipal lines. Even if one township resists,
adjacent approvals threaten regional roadways, water security, and electric utility rates
for all surrounding residents.
Kelly cautions municipal supervisors
against taking developer concessions at face value, breaking down how speculative corporate
applicants use phased applications and narrative promises to gain foothold approvals in
rural areas.
October
2025 · Hearing ReportKat Bolus | WVIA News
Lawyers, Residents and Experts in Clifton
Twp. Debate Project Gold Demands
Bolus reports from the Gouldsboro Fire
Hall during the Zoning Hearing Board challenge, documenting cross-examinations of the
developer's witnesses regarding building height requirements, 24/7 acoustic limits, and PPL
230 kV power procurement.
Clifton Township: Discussing Proposed Data
Center Uses
Archived recording of public discussions addressing the legal
and environmental impact of substantive validity challenges on local zoning.
National
Features & InvestigationsTIME · Grist · POLITICO
National Perspective: Noise, Water
Strain, and Community Impact
TIME Magazine: Inside the
Health Impact of Continuous Low-Frequency Server Fan Noise in Rural Neighborhoods.
Grist:
High Computing Demand Guzzling Groundwater and Pressuring Regional Watersheds.
POLITICO: How Utility
Ratepayers Face Long-Term Risk for Speculative Grid Upgrades.
Executive Summary (Updated August 2026)
Goldsboro Land LLC, JCO LLC, and Joseph C. Occhipinti, in partnership
with Quantm Group, LLC, have formally submitted a Conditional Use Application for
"Project Gold" to Covington Township. The application targets a 998.8-acre assemblage
(564.1 acres in Covington's DCET district and 434.7 acres in Clifton). Reengineered from
initial 2025 concepts, the current proposal calls for 6 single-story buildings (4 in
Covington), 2.2 GW grid power supplied by PPL, closed-loop air cooling (~8,512 GPD
domestic water draw), and 18 emergency life-safety generators.
Analysis of Project Gold (Clifton & Covington Townships)
Additional legal context: Pennsylvania’s public trust doctrine
Article I, Section 27 of the Pennsylvania Constitution protects the people’s rights
to clean air, pure water, and environmental preservation, and places Pennsylvania’s
public natural resources in trust for current and future generations.
In Pennsylvania Environmental Defense Foundation v. Commonwealth, 161 A.3d
911 (Pa. 2017), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court described the Commonwealth’s duty to
conserve and maintain public natural resources. That case concerned state forest
and park lands, not this private data-center proposal. Section 27 may be a legal
framework for counsel to assess when government decisions could affect qualifying
public resources; it does not automatically prohibit a private development or
establish that a violation has occurred.
This is general legal background, not legal advice.
Whether Section 27 applies to a specific Project Gold approval depends on the
resources and government actions involved and should be assessed by qualified
Pennsylvania counsel.
Local non-profit land trusts and watershed protectors
actively challenging zoning decisions and defending our headwaters in court.
501(c)(3)
Non-Profit Land Trust
Pocono Heritage Land Trust
(PHLT)
Active
Legal Challenge
The Pocono Heritage Land Trust (PHLT) is actively challenging municipal
zoning decisions in court to protect the irreplaceable natural landscapes of the North
Pocono region. PHLT holds a vital 772-acre conservation easement that would
be directly impacted and surrounded on three sides by the proposed Project Gold data center
complex.
Mounting a sustained legal defense requires specialized land use attorneys, hydrological
experts, and environmental consultants. If you are able to support this legal fight
directly, please consider making a tax-deductible donation.
Important
Donation Instruction:
When donating online, please specify "Covington / Clifton Data Center Legal
Fund" in the memo or note field so your contribution is designated directly
for this legal defense.
North Pocono C.A.R.E. is a local nonprofit organization dedicated to
protecting the Exceptional Value (EV) waters and headwaters of the Lehigh River basin. Their
volunteer monitors and leadership have been on the front lines monitoring stream quality,
opposing improper industrial zoning in Clifton and Covington Townships, and defending
watershed protections across the Pocono Plateau.
Reference links, municipal filings, and project applications.
1. Official Project Gold Filings
Document Item
Details
Filing Date
Conditional Use Narrative (Project Gold)
Comprehensive narrative by Goldsboro Land, LLC detailing reengineered
6-building layout, closed-loop cooling, and 2.2 GW grid power.
August 18, 2026
Conditional Use Site Plans (Langan CS100–106)
Engineered site drawings prepared by Langan Engineering showing building
FFEs, Dorantown Substation, and wetland fill boundaries.
August 18, 2026
Covington Public Hearing Application
Signed application by Anthony Maras, Esq. (Quantm Group) seeking Conditional
Use under Ordinance No. 2025-03.
August 17, 2026
Clifton Township Code Library
Codified township zoning and land use regulations.
Active Code
Independent Environmental Research
This section combines university and independent analysis with an industry perspective.
These sources discuss general data-center water and cooling technologies; none establishes
the cooling fluids or practices proposed for Project Gold.
University of Georgia Cooperative
Extension · Temporary Publication 121 · June 10, 2026
A general overview of data-center water use and
potential surface- and groundwater-quality pathways, including cooling additives
and non-water coolants.
Compares cooling approaches, including some
two-phase systems that use PFAS and single-phase direct-to-chip systems using a
water/glycol mixture.
Get in touch
Contact us
Have a question about the Covington or Clifton data center proposal? Send a message through
this form. The site’s inbox address is not displayed on the website.
Your message and reply address are delivered to the site inbox through Resend. The inbox address
is kept off the public page.